Methodology
How TrustGLP1 verifies what it publishes
A useful comparison needs more than confident prose. It needs a claim, the exact source behind it, a check date, visible limitations, and a person accountable for the decision to publish.
Different page types carry different obligations
A medicine-name lookup, a provider-price table, a clinical explainer, and an opinionated comparison are not the same editorial object. TrustGLP1 labels each page's purpose and review status instead of applying one vague trust badge across the entire site.
- Reference tools organize public records and state their limits.
- Commercial comparisons require current source-linked data and an unavoidable disclosure.
- Health-adjacent explainers require claim-level primary sources and visible review status.
- Analysis is identified as analysis rather than presented as a regulator or clinical fact.
Source order
Clinical, regulatory, and label facts start with direct public sources such as FDA records, DailyMed, NIH/NLM material, CMS, ClinicalTrials.gov, or primary peer-reviewed research. Specialty-society or academic explainers may add context. Reporting and provider pages are used for current events or a provider's own commercial claims, not as the sole basis for an independent clinical conclusion.
A source record should retain the exact URL, publisher, claim supported, publication or revision date when available, access date, volatility, limitation, and reviewer.
Commercial data and advertised prices
A provider's headline price is recorded as an advertised claim, not as a guaranteed final price. A complete comparison also tries to state the billing period, medication inclusion, membership fee, consultation, labs, shipping, commitment, and any condition visible in the source.
If an inclusion field cannot be determined, the page says “unclear.” It is not inferred from silence. Public commercial prices are intended to fail the build when their source is missing, their check date is missing, or the check date is more than seven days old.
Medical review status
TrustGLP1 does not make a blanket claim that every page is medically reviewed. A page may use that label only when a named, credentialed reviewer has approved that specific page and the date is visible. Otherwise, the page is marked as not medically reviewed and is kept within a bounded informational scope.
A reviewer must be able to block publication or send a page back. A structured-data field or a credential written into a template is not proof of review.
Commercial independence
TrustGLP1 may receive compensation from a provider or partner after a visitor follows a disclosed link. Compensation cannot determine the editorial conclusion, rating, comparison fields, organic placement, or whether a material disadvantage is shown.
The relevant disclosure appears before the first sponsored action. Read the fullcommercial disclosure.
Corrections and substantive updates
Accepted corrections are dated and reflected on the affected page. A material update should describe what changed rather than silently replacing history. Reports should identify the affected URL and, when possible, include the public source showing the issue.
Medical-advice boundary
TrustGLP1 is not a healthcare provider, pharmacy, or prescriber. It does not diagnose, prescribe, provide individualized dosing, promise outcomes, or tell a person which treatment is right for them. Personal questions belong with a licensed clinician who can evaluate the person's history and circumstances.