Medical review policy
No reviewer theater
TrustGLP1 does not label a page medically reviewed unless a named, appropriately credentialed reviewer approved that specific page and had authority to block publication.
What medical review means
A medical reviewer is expected to assess the health-adjacent claims within their scope, including:
- alignment with the cited primary records;
- unsupported efficacy, safety, causal, or individualized language;
- material omissions that could change a reader's understanding;
- uncertainty, limitations, and medical-advice boundaries;
- whether the page should publish, return for revision, or remain private.
What medical review does not mean
It is not an endorsement of a provider, a substitute for a clinician-patient relationship, a guarantee that a page will never become outdated, or permission to make a treatment choice for an individual reader.
Reviewer record
A reviewer profile should show name, role, credential, relevant jurisdiction or scope, a practical verification route where available, review date, and material-relationship disclosure. Licence numbers are not published merely as decoration.
Pages without medical review
A page without medical review says so and avoids claiming otherwise in visible copy, metadata, schema, or promotional material. Editorial and source review may still occur, but those states are not renamed “medical review.”